Industrial Microbiological QC Markets, 2028

DUBLIN, April 3, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — The “Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market: Focus on Technology Trends, Application, Regulatory Framework, and Competitive Mapping Analysis and Forecast: 2019-2028” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering.

The global industrial microbiological QC market has been witnessing a steady growth. The market is expected to continue to grow with a single digit CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period, 2019-2028.

Growing at a CAGR of 4.70% during the forecast period of 2019-2028, the conventional culture-based methods segment is anticipated to generate a value of $793.1 million in 2028. However, the market for rapid microbiological methods currently dominates the global industrial microbiological QC market, and is anticipated to grow at the fastest CAGR of 7.33% during the forecast period 2019-2028.

The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market, which includes various products, broadly classified as rapid microbiological methods and conventional culture-based methods. However, the market estimation only comprises manufacturers of these products.

Although microbiological testing is reasonably spread around the world, testing practices within various geographic regions vary significantly. Automation provides significant time and cost savings, while also reducing the potential of human error. It also enables the provision of consistently reliable and accurate results. There are commercially available automated and semi-automated systems that are based on several technologies such as real-time PCR, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, bioluminescence technology, and Enzyme-linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA), among others.

Most of these technologies are aimed at providing efficiency gains when compared to traditional laboratory technologies, and therefore have significant potential for both time and cost savings. Hence, these technologies are adopted for the detection and identification of pathogens and other micro-organisms in the manufacturing process of industries, to avoid the further chances of the product recalls.

The global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into four different segments namely technology, consumers, applications, and regions. These segments are further segmented into several sub-segments to ease the market estimation and to gain a holistic view of the market. The market has also been broadly segmented into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume with respect to the consumers and applications that are present in the market. The global market value was estimated using different approaches and validated with each other.

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include

  • 3M Company
  • BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH
  • Becton, Dickinson and Company
  • bioMrieux SA
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • Biolog, Inc.
  • Bruker Corporation
  • Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • Danaher Corporation
  • Merck KGaA
  • Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.)
  • QIAGEN N.V.
  • R-Biopharm AG
  • Sartorius AG
  • Shimadzu Corporation
  • Sysmex Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Key Topics Covered:

Executive Summary

1 Market Overview

1.1 Market Introduction

1.2 Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market Overview

1.3 Economic Burden of the Failed Microbiological QC

1.3.1 Pharmaceutical Industry

1.3.2 Food, Beverage, Agriculture & Fermentation Industry

1.3.3 Cosmetic Industry

1.3.4 Water Industry

1.3.5 Paper Industry

1.3.6 Biotechnology Industry

1.3.7 Other Industries

2 Industry Insights

2.1 Key Developments and Strategies

2.1.1 Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions

2.1.2 Product Launches and Approvals

2.1.3 Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements

2.1.4 Mergers and Acquisitions

2.2 Legal Requirements and Regulations

2.2.1 Microbiology Standards

2.2.2 Pharmaceutical Industry

2.2.2.1 FDA Guidance

2.2.2.2 EU Directives

2.2.2.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms

2.2.3 Food and Beverage Industry

2.2.3.1 FDA Guidance

2.2.3.2 EU Directive

2.2.3.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms

2.2.4 Dairy Industry

2.2.4.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.4.2 EU Directive

2.2.4.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms

2.2.5 Agriculture and Fermentation Industry

2.2.5.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.5.2 EU Directive

2.2.5.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms

2.2.6 Paper Industry

2.2.6.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.6.2 EU Directive

2.2.7 Biotechnology Industry

2.2.7.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.7.2 EU Directive

2.2.8 Cosmetic Industry

2.2.8.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.8.2 EU Directive

2.2.9 Water Industry

2.2.9.1 FDA Guidelines

2.2.9.2 EU Directives

2.3 Patent Analysis

2.3.1 by Country

2.3.2 by Year

3 Technology Trends

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Real-Time PCR

3.3 MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

3.4 Bioluminescence Technology

3.5 Flow Cytometry

3.6 Membrane Filtration

3.7 Fluorescent-based Technology

3.8 Colorimetric Technology

3.9 Sandwich Hybridization

3.10 Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA)

3.11 Other Technologies

4 Market Dynamics

4.1 Market Dynamics: Overview

4.2 Drivers

4.3 Challenges

4.4 Opportunities

4.5 Impact Analysis

5 Competitive Insights

5.1 Industrial Microbiological QC Manufacturers by Industrial Areas

5.2 Market Share Analysis, by Company

5.2.1 bioMrieux SA

5.2.2 Merck KGaA

5.2.3 Market Share Analysis, Becton, Dickinson and Company

5.2.4 3M Company

5.2.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

5.2.6 Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

5.2.7 Danaher Corporation

5.2.8 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

5.2.9 Market Share Analysis, Sartorius AG
5.2.10 Hygiena, LLC
5.2.11 Bruker Corporation
5.2.12 Qiagen N.V.
5.2.13 Shimadzu Corporation

5.3 Growth Share Matrix

5.3.1 Company

5.3.2 by Technology

5.3.3 by Region

5.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis

5.5 Comprehensive Competitive Index

5.6 Competitor Value Chain Analysis

5.7 Competitor Supply Chain Analysis

5.8 Competitor Brand-Value Matrix

6 Cost & Pricing Trends

6.1 Microbiological QC Cost Per Product

6.2 Microbiological QC Cost Vs Production Cost

7 Consumer Analysis

7.1 Overview

7.2 Product Testing Laboratories

7.3 Research and Academic Institutions

7.4 Pharma and Biotech Companies

7.5 Regulatory and Environment Agencies

7.6 Food and Beverage Companies

7.7 Other Industries

8 Global Industrial Microbiology Market by Application

8.1 Overview

8.2 Pharmaceutical Industry

8.3 Food and Beverage Industry

8.4 Dairy Industry

8.5 Agriculture and Fermentation Industry

8.6 Paper Industry

8.7 Biotechnology Industry

8.8 Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry

8.9 Water and Environmental Industry

8.10 Other Industries

9 Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market by Region

10 Company Profiles

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/j94smb/industrial?w=5

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager
press@researchandmarkets.com   

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

Related Links

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

WHAT TO READ NEXT...