MALVERN, Pa., March 13, 2019 — The Frontline Research & Learning Institute today announced the release of “Growth Metrics for K-12 Human Capital Management” (HCM), a report that articulates a framework for tracking and using talent data to inform the policies and practices aimed at recruiting, retaining and supporting effective teachers. Rather than adopt a transient approach to HCM, the report urges a deliberate strategy that is grounded in evidence for thoughtful and lasting short- and long-term results.
“Education reforms have come and gone over the last decade but investing in recruiting, hiring and talent management processes should never be victimized by shifting policies or politics,” says Elizabeth Combs, Managing Director for the Frontline Research & Learning Institute. “Legislation and policy changes provide new opportunities to focus on human capital management strategies and lean on data to make change and measure progress.”
To that end, the institute report outlines Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to help address human capital at each point along a lifecycle from recruitment through ongoing professional learning. The metrics – generated from Frontline Education’s vast and erse database of more than 80,000 schools and several million users – are organized into buckets of recruiting and hiring, engagement and learning and evaluation and feedback. KPIs include:
- Jobs are posted in January-March and filled no later than April – to assure the best candidates can identify open roles early and that hiring managers have a broad selection of high-quality candidates. In the most recent year, postings were more concentrated in May and hiring peaked between July and August.
- The time it takes to fill open teaching positions is brief and standardized – to bring efficiency and effectiveness to selecting for long-term retention and educator success. Data shows that it takes the most time to fill positions posted in October which may be attributed to holding roles open for seniority-based hiring processes as part of Collective Bargaining Agreements. Opening hiring windows earlier and making roles available based upon qualifications other than seniority sooner in the year may help.
- Both referral and hiring sources reflect a broad ersity of origins – Create a wide recruitment pipeline by maximizing routes like job boards and training program partnerships but also ensure that hiring processes do not introduce bias by hiring to match the current workforce rather than hiring to meet the needs of students. Even in cases where the recruiting pool is erse, institute data shows bias can easily creep into a hiring process that prioritizes “cultural fit” or other characteristics of the current workforce rather than what experiences and traits will best serve students.
- Teachers do not need to miss school for professional reasons and should use time away sparingly – Set schedules to dramatically reduce or eliminate the need for professionally related absences. According to institute data, of on average 16.4 days of teacher absences, 22.5 percent are likely to be work-related.
- Professional development meets the minimum criteria set by ESSA – Maximize professional development investments with high-quality learning opportunities. The institute’s data shows that most professional growth opportunities do not meet the criteria outlined by ESSA.
- Professional learning takes place at consistent intervals – Provide a culture of continuous learning. Institute data indicates most professional learning still takes place in August and September while teachers could benefit from yearlong growth opportunities.
- Summative performance evaluations show differentiation that is aligned with educators’ demonstrated skills – Accurately identify areas of strength and growth opportunities. Institute data suggests evaluation systems have matured and may provide more accurate, differentiated data that educators and their coaches can use to improve performance.
- Educators regularly collaborate with other educators in their subject areas, grade levels and across the curriculum – Cultivate open, honest and actionable feedback that is delivered in a safe and productive way. Most evaluation efforts, according to institute data, occur in isolation and are not conducive to observation and effective feedback. Adjusting scheduling to give teachers time each week to talk about practice and plan for instruction.
Fittingly, the report was released during the first annual Frontline Insights Summit in Orlando, a two-day conference focused on supporting education leaders and ensuring that they lead confidence, leveraging the right strategies and data to make informed decisions on behalf of their schools, educators and students.
About the Frontline Research & Learning Institute:
The Frontline Research & Learning Institute is a ision of Frontline Education, a leading provider of school administration software, empowering strategic K-12 leaders with the right tools, data and insights to proactively manage human capital, business operations and special education. The mission of the Institute is to provide data-driven research, resources and observations to support and advance the education community. The research is driven by the vast amount of data derived from solutions that Frontline provides to more than 12,000 educational organizations, representing over 80,000 schools and more than 60 percent of the nation’s school districts.
SOURCE The Frontline Research & Learning Institute